LYSIS Archive · Art and Literature

DEATH AND LIFE, a Brief Reading of Gustav Klimt's Painting

Published on LYSIS on

Image and attachment links point to their original locations.

View original image (Death and Life, Gustav Klimt, 1910–1915. Oil on canvas, 178 x 198 cm. Leopold Museum, Vienna, Austria.)  

In “Death and Life”, Gustav Klimt stages a symbolic and ontological confrontation between two fundamental principles of existence: impermanence and the desire to go on. On the left, the skeletal figure of Death, wrapped in sombre colours, looks almost smilingly at the cluster of human bodies on the right, naked, intertwined, sleeping or dreaming. There is a watchful, inevitable presence without a direct clash. It is in this silent tension that the painting attains its philosophical force.

Death, as a figure in its own right, appears here as a necessary witness, rather than a brutal interruption. Death watches over life's sleep. And watching over is a way of making permanent. Its position to the side, almost at the edge of the scene, reveals its function: to remind us. Here death has nothing to do with destruction (see my book Vita on the necessary relation between life and death). It is both threat and measure. Life, in all its plenitude of bodies and colours, takes shape only by being constantly under death's gaze. This is the painting's first ontological gesture: life and death are mutually implicated, rather than opposed. Existence becomes aware of itself only because it is finite.

At the centre of the human cluster, tender gestures, closed eyes and surrender to the moment are entwined, as if life could resist death only by ignoring it. And yet there it is. This refusal, this gentle refusal to see, sustains the illusion that existence needs if it is to continue. To live, human beings must pretend they will never die.

Klimt thus sketches a tragic balance rather than a battle. The desire to live, in embraces, nakedness, procreation and rest, is always crossed by the shadow of the end. And still it flourishes. This vital impulse comes close to what Schopenhauer calls the “Will”: a blind, irrational movement that manifests itself as desire, reproduction and attachment. Life, in its intertwined bodies, gives visual form to a wanting that offers no justification and yet persists.

Schopenhauer's aesthetic redemption allows art to suspend the Will momentarily. Klimt, however, seems to reject the idea of escape. His painting is carnal, fecund and intensely earthly. What we see here is celebration in place of renunciation. Death intensifies our wonder at the world instead of giving us a way to escape it. Life's beauty lies in its fragility. By depicting death with dignity and serenity, Klimt returns it to the cycle and restores its structuring function: death gives life its contours.

The painting also suggests a profound psychological dimension. The closed eyes of the living may express denial as well as peace. The figure of Death, watching from the corner, seems to tolerate the gesture. As if it were saying, “Keep dreaming. I will wait.” There is an echo here of Greek tragedy: wisdom lies in recognizing limits rather than overcoming them.

In short, “Death and Life” is a pictorial meditation on the human condition. Klimt suggests that to live is to inhabit the interval between desire and the end, between impulse and silence. The painting offers neither consolation nor promises. It illuminates, like a candle held up to the abyss. In that faint light we glimpse what is most profound: the silent, inseparable dance of life and death.

Prof. (and student) Alexandre H. Reis